Washington St.
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
63  Michael Williams SO 31:37
66  John Whelan JR 31:38
194  Sam Levora SO 32:13
309  Chandler Teigen FR 32:35
416  Nathan Tadesse FR 32:48
425  Nathan Wadhwani FR 32:49
541  Jake Finney FR 33:03
1,131  Paul Ryan FR 33:58
1,244  Kyler Little FR 34:08
1,781  Alex Simpson JR 34:57
National Rank #30 of 308
West Region Rank #7 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 10.6%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.6%
Top 20 at Nationals 6.2%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 18.6%
Top 10 in Regional 97.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Michael Williams John Whelan Sam Levora Chandler Teigen Nathan Tadesse Nathan Wadhwani Jake Finney Paul Ryan Kyler Little Alex Simpson
Washington Invitational 10/02 799 32:22 31:51 32:38 33:11 32:30 32:49 34:04 34:06
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 715 31:46 31:53 32:25 32:41 33:06 32:42 33:48
Inland Empire Championships 10/17 33:10 33:51 34:58
Pac 12 Championships 10/30 583 31:21 31:17 32:07 32:34 33:47 33:17 32:49 34:01 34:38
West Region Championships 11/13 475 31:17 31:07 32:05 32:19 32:08 33:30 33:17
NCAA Championship 11/21 673 31:31 31:58 32:21 32:40 32:49 32:32 33:22





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 10.6% 19.1 476 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
Region Championship 100% 7.1 191 0.1 1.1 5.7 11.7 17.6 22.6 20.5 12.0 6.0 2.0 0.7 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Michael Williams 69.7% 58.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.9
John Whelan 68.1% 61.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6
Sam Levora 12.6% 123.6
Chandler Teigen 10.6% 171.0
Nathan Tadesse 10.6% 197.4
Nathan Wadhwani 10.6% 196.6
Jake Finney 10.7% 217.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Michael Williams 12.9 0.4 1.6 3.0 4.4 4.3 5.4 5.9 5.0 5.8 5.3 4.8 4.7 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.2 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.8 1.6
John Whelan 13.3 0.3 1.0 2.3 3.6 4.9 4.9 5.6 6.0 4.9 4.9 5.5 4.7 4.2 4.3 3.5 3.6 2.6 2.9 2.5 1.9 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.6
Sam Levora 36.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.9
Chandler Teigen 56.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Nathan Tadesse 68.7
Nathan Wadhwani 68.7
Jake Finney 83.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 1.1% 73.2% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.8 3
4 5.7% 59.3% 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.1 2.3 3.4 4
5 11.7% 35.6% 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1 7.5 4.2 5
6 17.6% 10.0% 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.1 15.8 1.8 6
7 22.6% 2.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 22.1 0.5 7
8 20.5% 20.5 8
9 12.0% 12.0 9
10 6.0% 6.0 10
11 2.0% 2.0 11
12 0.7% 0.7 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 10.6% 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.7 0.5 89.4 0.1 10.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 38.3% 1.0 0.4
Minnesota 25.4% 1.0 0.3
California 23.4% 1.0 0.2
Eastern Michigan 22.0% 1.0 0.2
Florida 8.5% 1.0 0.1
Georgia 6.3% 1.0 0.1
Cornell 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Stephen F. Austin 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 2.1% 1.0 0.0
North Texas 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Yale 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Duke 0.0% 1.0 0.0
San Francisco 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 7.0